Wednesday, June 29, 2005

When the Government Plays at Being God

One more step to a socialist, police State:

The "Kelo vs. City of New London" decision by the Supreme Court allows city governments to take land from one private owner and give it to another if the government will generate greater tax revenue or other economic benefits when the land is developed by the new owner.

Exodus 20:15 "Thou shalt not steal."

But I love this man's reaction:

"On Monday June 27, Logan Darrow Clements, faxed a request to Chip Meany the code enforcement officer of the Towne of Weare, New Hampshire seeking to start the application process to build a hotel on 34 Cilley Hill Road. This is the present location of Mr. Souter's home" (Mr. Souter is a Supreme Court Justice who voted for the "Kelo vs. City of New London" decision).

Get the whole story!

Saturday, June 25, 2005

"It"

"It" is not about "Left" or "Right," "Liberal" or "Conservative." It is not about maintaining strict denominational or party lines. Our allegiance is not to The Democracy or The Republic, the flag nor the Constitution. All of these words are man-made and their meanings, and the ideas which they represent, change over time. So what is "it" about then?

"It" (our life) is about whom we serve. Will we serve God or man? Life is about the kingdom of God. Life is about the Lordship of Jesus Christ.

I am not suggesting ecumenicalism (which sacrifices truth to the god of unity) or any other such heretical thing. What I am suggesting is that Christians wake up and act like what we call ourselves. Stop worshipping the world and its tantalizing tidbits and its delectable delicacies, all of which have no more value than a child's plastic beaded necklace. We have called out to be a holy people, a priestly nation.

The vast majority of those who profess to be Christians, have isolated God to a matter of the heart, a personal religion. God is good for Sunday and sappy T-shirts, but nothing else. Christianity, by a large majority, has been swallowed up by our megatainment, egocentric culture. They are blind, deaf and dumb to the overtly humanistic, Satan worshiping world around them. So what are we supposed to do?

We are to read God's Word and do what it says. We are to listen to His voice and keep His covenant (Ex. 19:5). We are to build and rebuild the world around us in terms of His Word, His truth. We are to bow our knee to Christ and worship Him as Lord and King.

Here are Jesus', our Savior and Lord's, own words:

Matt. 6:33
"But seek first His kingdom and His righteousness, and all these things will be added to you."

John 14:15
"If you love Me, you will keep My commandments."

Matt. 22:37
And He said to him, " `YOU SHALL LOVE THE LORD YOUR GOD WITH ALL YOUR HEART, AND WITH ALL YOUR SOUL, AND WITH ALL YOUR MIND.'

Matt. 28:18-20 (ISV)
Then Jesus came up and said to them, "All authority in heaven and on earth has been given to me. 19 Therefore, as you go, disciple all the nations, baptizing them in the name of the Father, and of the Son, and of the Holy Spirit, 20 teaching them to obey all that I have commanded you. And remember, I am with you each and every day until the end of the age."

These are not easy things to do. I struggle with this every day. I struggle with how to train up my children in the way they should go (Proverbs 22:6). But it is a struggle that I must wrestle with, a struggle that I must attack head on, for the consequences, if I do not, are eternal.

Proverbs 8:32-36
32 "Now therefore, O sons, listen to me, For blessed are they who keep my ways. 33 "Heed instruction and be wise, And do not neglect it. 34 "Blessed is the man who listens to me, Watching daily at my gates, Waiting at my doorposts. 35 "For he who finds me finds life And obtains favor from the LORD. 36 "But he who sins against me injures himself; All those who hate me love death."

1 John 2:15
Do not love the world or the things in the world. If anyone loves the world, the love of the Father is not in him.

Monday, June 20, 2005

"Learn not the way of the heathen"

Jeremiah. 10:2a "Thus saith the LORD, Learn not the way of the heathen" (KJV).

The Hebrew word translated in Jeremiah 10:2 as "heathen" is Goyim. The Hebrew word can be translated as "heathen," "people" or "nations" and refers to non-Jewish peoples -- the Gentiles or unbelievers. We can understand the passage this way:

The Lord commands us not to learn the ways or customs of those who do not believe.

Young's Literal Translation has it as "Unto the way of the nations accustom not yourselves"

Do believers really need any other argument to pull their children out of the pagan public school system? The Lord has explicitly commanded His people not to learn the ways of those who do not believe in Him - this is exactly what the statist, humanistic, anti-God, public school system is doing. It is teaching your children the ways of the heathen.

Don't believe me? Read their words, written by their own pens:


Charles Francis Potter, signer of the Humanist Manifesto and author of Humanism: A New Religion, wrote, "So Humanism is not simply another denomination of Protestant Christianity; it is not a creed; nor is it a cult. It is a new type of religion altogether." Potter also directed attention to the battleground where the humanist religion dominates ? the public school system. Potter said,

"Education is the most powerful ally of Humanism, and every American public school is a school of Humanism. What can the theistic Sunday Schools, meeting for an hour once a week, and teaching only a fraction of the children, do to stem the tide of a five-day program of humanistic teaching?"

... "Humanist educator John Dewey [father of modern progressive education], also a signer of the Humanist Manifesto, called for a new humanist religion in his work A Common Faith.

This is not simply a natural "evolution" of education as might be claimed. It is a direct assault against God, Christianity, and your family.

In 1897, John Dewey wrote that the teacher is always "the true prophet of the true God, and the usherer in of the true kingdom of God." (Lawrence A. Cremin: Public Education, p. 76f. via R.J. Rushdoony in his The Philosophy of the Christian Curriculum, p. 175) But what "God" and what "kingdom of God" is Dewey talking about? Is it the God of the Bible? The answer is an emphatic "NO!" His idea of God is the union of the "ideal" and the action or experience which supports the realization of that ideal - the human experience. In his A Common Faith, Dewey writes:

The idea of God, or, to avoid misleading conceptions, the idea of the divine is, one of ideal possibilities unified through imaginative realization and projection. But this idea of God, or of the divine, is also connected with all the natural forces and conditions - including man and human association - that promote the growth of the ideal and that further its realization. We are in the presence neither of ideals completely embodied in existence nor yet of ideals that are mere rootless ideals, fantasies, utopias. For there are forces in nature and society that generate and support the ideals. They are further unified by the action that gives them coherence and solidity. It is this active relation between ideal and actual to which I would give the name "God." I would not insist that the name must be given.

(John Dewey, "Faith and its Object," Abridged from A Common Faith, http://www.harvardsquarelibrary.org/unitarians/dewey.html)

His god being now the creation of man's own experience as he works toward realizing his own ideas, Dewey destroys any foundation for the existence of an absolute truth. By defining God this way, Dewey has created a god who is constantly evolving as man's ideals change and as he experiences new ways to actualize these new ideals.

His philosophy, his god, has actualized into what we see today in public school system:

  • Moral Relativism (no absolute truth - no ethics or morals - no fixed standards)
  • Academic Dumbing Down (everyone must be equal - lowest common denominator)
  • Far-left Programs/Socialism (cradle to grave security - complete dependence on the State)
  • Near Absence of Discipline (No concept of real authority)

20 years ago, parents would have been appalled at the idea that the State owned their children, now many are appalled at the thought that the State does not and should not own their children. "Yes," many of today's parents would say, "parents have certain responsibilities toward their children, but in the end it is the States responsibility to feed, educate, train and employ them."

But what does God's Word say?

4 "Hear, O Israel: The Lord our God, the Lord is one! 5 You shall love the Lord your God with all your heart, with all your soul, and with all your strength. 6 "And these words which I command you today shall be in your heart. 7 You shall teach them diligently to your children, and shall talk of them when you sit in your house, when you walk by the way, when you lie down, and when you rise up. 8 You shall bind them as a sign on your hand, and they shall be as frontlets between your eyes. 9 You shall write them on the doorposts of your house and on your gates. (Deut. 6:4-9, NKJV)

We are to teach our children. And what are we to teach them? "These words which I command you." We are to teach our children to "love the Lord your God with all your heart, with all your soul, and with all your strength." We are to teach our children that Jesus is the King which rules and has dominion over all things.

9 Therefore God also has highly exalted Him and given Him the name which is above every name, 10 that at the name of Jesus every knee should bow, of those in heaven, and of those on earth, and of those under the earth, 11 and that every tongue should confess that Jesus Christ is Lord, to the glory of God the Father. (Phil. 2:9-11, NKJV)
We must teach them that since God created everything, they must understand all things according to how He defines them in His revealed Word.

Monday, June 13, 2005

A Great Deliverance

When you have a post like my previous one, you had better be prepared to subject yourself to the same scrutiny.

If you are interested here is a link to the sermon on Genesis 47 I had the honor to preach this past Sunday. http://www.trinitybaptist-church.org/sermons/tbcwf_sermon_2005_06_12.ram

I have not listened to the whole thing yet, as that is always a little painful (especially since I stutter).

More Lies Women Believe

In the not too distant past, my wife read a very popular book for women by Nancy Leigh DeMoss entitled Lies Women Believe: And the Truth that Sets Them Free. Unfortunately, instead of freeing women from slavery to a worldly system of thought and belief, it enslaves them further to it.

At one point in the book she tells women that Eve's sin in the garden of Eden was that of "overeating." When my wife tried to argue with some other ladies that this was not the correct interpretation of Scripture, she posed the question "If God had said do not walk within so many feet of the tree, would her sin been over-walking?" I believe the overwhelming response was, after a short pause, "Yes." The author's interpretation of the Bible at this point, is at best manipulative, if not outright deceitful and it clearly leads women away from the clear teaching of Scripture and the freedom found therein.

Man's sin in the garden of Eden is wanting to be his own god, determining for himself what was good and evil. This is exactly what the Bible says in Gen. 3:5-6 (NASB):

"5 For God knows that in the day you eat from it your eyes will be opened, and you will be like God, knowing good and evil."

"6 When the woman saw that the tree was good for food, and that it was a delight to the eyes, and that the tree was desirable to make {one} wise, she took from its fruit and ate; and she gave also to her husband with her, and he ate."


Eve disregarded the clear Word of God (which she already stated she knew in verse 3), and decided that her own thoughts and desires were of a higher authority. She looked to something outside of God to make her wise.

Nancy DeMoss, by interpreting the Bible this way, has succumbed to the same sin. She has ignored the clear, explicit teaching of Scripture, and interpreted it in a way that no one would have ever interpreted it, so that it would fit her desired agenda.

Lest you think I'm trying to pick a fight with Mrs. DeMoss, this is the same sin that is at the root of all of our sins. Every man wishes to be autonomous, thereby interpreting God, himself, and the rest of the world on his own terms, according to his own wisdom.

Our starting point as Christians, must be that since God is Creator of all things, He is the only interpreter of all things. We can not do as the ancient philosopher Descartes did and start with ourselves, "I think, therefore I am." By doing so, one makes himself as the sole interpreter of all things, including God.

Because we all are tainted with sin, we all make mistakes interpreting Scripture. But because this is such a gross misinterpretation, it deserves a stern correction. If she wants to teach women about overeating or proper care for their physical bodies, there are plenty of other verses in Scripture that she could use to do this.

Recommended Reading:
By What Standard? by R.J. Rushdoony

Wednesday, June 01, 2005

NC Voters - Take Action!

“The first American Revolution had to be fought with guns and lives because they had no recourse before a tyrannical king. Our war is different. We have recourse, that is, our vote. We can affect the course of our future and regain our freedoms by participating in the system our forefathers secured with their blood.”
Stiles J. Watson, Why You Should Vote for Michael Peroutka

The following is from the desk of webmaster@constitutionpartync.com

Forward this to anyone you know that may support it.

House Bill 88 (Electoral Fairness). Two years ago House Bill 867 was introduced, which would have lowered the petition requirements for ballot access from 2% of voters in the last gubernatorial election to .5%, and would have lowered the threshold for maintaining ballot access from 10% to 2%. Though it passed committee, the co-speakers in the Legislature denied it a vote. The bill has been reintroduced as House Bill 88 and has already passed committee.

The state Representative who introduced House Bill 88 (the one that will reduce our signature requirement from 69,000 to 17,500 to get on state ballots) says if we want this bill heard this year, we need to pressure the Finance Committee to move on it.

Paul Luebke is the sponsor and one of the Finance chairs. He suggests writing the other five co-chairs of the Finance Committee and asking that they hear House Bill 88.

Below are emails and phone numbers:
Martha Alexander, Marthaa@ncleg.net, 919-733-5807
Pryor Gibson, Pryorg@ncleg.net, 919-715-3007
Julia Howard, Juliah@ncleg.net, 919-733-5904
Paul Luebke, Paull@ncleg.net, 919-733-7663
Danny McComas, Dannym@ncleg.net, 919-733-5786
William Wainwright, Williamw@ncleg.net, 919-733-5995

After Four Decades, Democrats Admit Liberals Are Socialists

From May 22, 2005 Meet the Press

MR. RUSSERT: In your home state of Vermont, there's a vacancy for the United States Senate about to occur. Bernie Sanders, the congressman from Vermont, wants to run for that seat. He is a self- described avowed socialist.

DR. DEAN: Well, that's what he says. He's really a populist.

MR. RUSSERT: But is there room in the Democratic Party for a socialist?

DR. DEAN: Well, first of all, he's not a socialist, really.

MR. RUSSERT: He...

DR. DEAN: He hasn't said that for a while.

MR. RUSSERT: Oh, he has a--he wrote in his book: "Outside or in the House, I am a Democratic socialist."

DR. DEAN: Well, a Democratic socialist--all right, we're talking about words here. And Bernie can call himself anything he wants. He is basically a liberal Democrat . . .

___

Ever since LBJ changed our nation from a Constitutional Republic to a socialist nation, the Democrats have avoided confirming that the liberals' agenda is socialism.

Howard Dean admitting that a socialist is just a "liberal Democrat" is what conservatives have been noting for four decades, something neither high-level Democrats nor Republicans want to confirm to the naive masses of this nation. Never before has a socialist "leader" of the Democratic party admitted that liberals are socialists. Yesterday was a watershed "coming out of the closet" event for the Marxists that control the Democratic party.

The astute minority has known this before Dean's acknowledgement. The majority--that great mass of naive apathetic sheep--don't know this because they rely on the mainstream press and the "high-level politicians" to format their thinking.

With the head of the Democratic party making it official, we can now confirm it: the Democrats are socialists.

Robert Sentry, Publisher
Sentry Over America

Related FaithAndDominion.com blogs (in no particlular order):

http://faithanddominion.blogspot.com/2004/12/basis-of-all-our-civil-constitutions.html
http://faithanddominion.blogspot.com/2004/10/why-you-should-vote-for-michael.html
http://faithanddominion.blogspot.com/2004/12/not-creature-was-stirring-not-even.html
http://faithanddominion.blogspot.com/2004/12/two-great-articles-on-socialist-pledge.html
http://faithanddominion.blogspot.com/2004/12/christian-social-action.html